Why Simplicity in Patient Education Is So Hard — and So Worth It

Years ago, patient education materials mostly lived in starter kits and often were walked through with a nurse in the home or clinic. During a video marketing research interview one day, I recall a patient with a rare disease showing me a brochure that had become a constant companion -- creased, flagged with sticky tabs, softened at the edges. She said she kept it nearby because it “was the most important reference” for her treatment journey.

That moment has stayed with me. It reminded me that when done well, patient materials aren’t just informational -- they’re grounding. They provide confidence when everything else feels uncertain.

Fast-forward to today. Patients still need that reassurance, but how they access information has changed dramatically. Hard copies remain, but now content must function across multiple devices, large and small screens, formats, and moments: on a phone at the pharmacy, on a laptop after a doctor visit, as part of onboarding through specialty pharmacy, or woven into a digital support experience.

And as channels multiply, so does the responsibility to get the foundations right. Because patients may be empowered and informed, but they (and their loved ones) are also overwhelmed -- and increasingly left to decode complex information without support in real time. And this is where our discipline remains essential.

Despite the digital transformation, what has not changed is the need for a systematic, thoughtful, and iterative primary research approach when developing patient-facing education. In fact, it’s more necessary than ever.

‍

Patient Knowledge Is Deep — but Often Fragmented

After speaking with thousands of patients and caregivers across a wide spectrum of medical conditions, one pattern consistently emerges: their knowledge is real, but it’s acquired in pieces. A mix of lived experience, clinician conversations, online communities, social media, late-night searching, advocacy groups, and trial-and-error learning.

Patients and caregivers can possess a sophisticated understanding in one area while holding misconceptions or gaps in another. And because their learning often happens under emotional strain, their processing and prioritization can be nonlinear.

This means patient materials must do more than “explain.” They must:

• Strengthen correct mental models
• Gently correct misconceptions
• Build confidence without oversimplifying
• Reduce cognitive effort
• Earn trust, especially among those cautious or skeptical

None of that happens through intuition. It happens through research.

Albert Einstein is often quoted as saying, “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” My colleague Carolyn Peterson always used to hold us to this standard.

Nowhere is that more relevant than in patient education. Achieving clarity without sacrificing accuracy is incredibly hard -- and it is exactly why structured research matters.

‍

A Structured Research Approach Still Wins

Whenever we partner with commercial teams on patient materials, my colleagues and I at ThinkGen follow a disciplined, multi-phase research process grounded in curiosity, humility, patience and respect. It has held up through technological shifts and media evolution because it honors human behavior.

• We begin with foundational message exploration: understanding what patients need to believe, understand, and feel in order to consider treatment confidently and stay engaged with it. We listen for sequencing, trust cues, and the emotional cadence of decision-making.
• From there, we move to white-page content testing: evaluating clarity and logic before creative layers enter the conversation. Without graphics or color to soften confusion, we see where language is dense, where context is missing, and where cognitive overload starts to creep in.
• Only after the story works in pure form do we test creative execution. Structure, navigation, visuals, pacing, tone: all tested across the same range of literacy, comfort, and learning styles patients bring into the real world. And in today’s environment, we must ensure content holds up not only on paper, but on a smartphone screen -- where a paragraph can become a wall of text, and scrolling fatigue can reduce comprehension.

Across all stages, diversity of participation isn’t a nice-to-have; it's core to getting it right. Health literacy varies widely, and traditional recruitment often over-represents the most activated patients. We owe it to the communities we serve to include a true spectrum of readers, thinkers, and learners.

‍

Preparing for What Comes Next

AI will soon shape patient communication in profoundly useful ways: adaptive content, literacy-aligned readability, even emotion-sensitive sequencing. We’re undoubtedly leaning into that future.

But AI will only be as good as the human listening that shapes its foundation. It can accelerate refinement. It can’t replace understanding.

The work still begins where it always has: in dialogue, in nuance, in genuine curiosity about how real patients process complex information in moments that matter.

‍

The Human Outcome Still Matters Most

At the end of the day, this is not about producing brochures or PDFs. It’s about whether a patient who is scared or hopeful or exhausted can find clarity when they need it most: whether on paper, online, or on a screen in their hand.

That dog-eared brochure wasn’t just a document that we painstakingly researched, produced and delivered. At the end of the day, it was her reassurance. It was her direction. It was her stability during uncertainty.

And that remains the benchmark.

As an industry, we are being called to meet patients where they are -- with rigor, humility, and care. Powerful science deserves equally powerful communication. Patients deserve materials that honor their complexity and support their decisions.

And that only happens when our insights discipline shows up fully: structured, curious, grounded in the voices we serve.